Subscribe via RSS Feed
banner ad

Grand jury developments

[ 0 ] October 1, 2013 |
Dismissal of grand jury sought based on unlawful petition
Three of the targets of a proposed Rogers County Grand Jury have filed a motion to dismiss the entire grand jury pproceeding.
The motion, filed about 3 p.m. Friday in Rogers County District Court, said circulators used an unauthorized “tabloid” version of the petition which was approved by the court to collect signatures.
The version used to gather signatures is inaccurate and not authorized by law, voiding all signatures collected and requiring the termination of the proceeding, the motion contends.
The complete motion with brief and attachments is available here: gjmotion
The Leader will post an analysis of the motion and the issues it raises later today after staff members have an adequate opportunity to review the document and research the legal points and contentions it raises.

Supreme Court ousts judge assigned to grand jury

By JOHN M. WYLIE II, Publisher

Oklahoma’s Supreme Court has removed the Grady County judge assigned to oversee the Rogers County grand jury proceeding targeting the District Attorney, three key assistants and two county commissioners.

By a vote of 7-0 with two abstentions, the court on Thursday withdrew the appointment of District Judge Richard Van Dyck and apointed Tulsa County District Judge Jefferson D. Sellers to handle the case.

Chief Justice Tom Colbert had appointed Van Dyck on Aug. 26 to handle the case after District Judge Dwayne Steidley, presiding judge for both the 12th Judicial District and the Northeastern Judicial Administrative District, asked for an outside appointment.

Judge Steidley is the cousin of DA Steidley’s husband, and has consistently recused himself from any matter in which she is the subject.

The Supreme Court order cites no reason, but Van Dyck’s removal had been sought by Joel Wohlgemuth, Steidley’s attorney, after he issued an order sealing grand jury signatures without citing any statute, constitutional provision or case law justifying closure of such records.

He acted without any hearing or notice to the parties based on a petition from Claremore Police Investigator John Singer, who is one of the six individuals who filed a petition seeking a grand jury.

Voting in favor of the order replacing Van Dyck were Vice Chief Justice John Reif and Justices Yvonne Kauger, James Winchester, James Edmondson, Steven W. Taylor, Douglas L. Combs and Noma D. Gurich.

Joining Chief Justice Colbert in abstaining was Justice Joseph M. Watt.

The Rogers County Election Board determined that signatures of registered county voters well exceeded the number required for a grand jury, and Van Dyck had set a hearing for Tuesday on whether the requirements to proceed with a grand jury have been met.

Wohlgemuth asked Van Wyck to remove himself from the case and overturn the order sealing the records. Van Dyck rejected both motions, but did dissolve the order sealing the signatures in the “interest of justice and transparency.” The signatures are available on the court website, , and on the Leader website,

Wohlgemuth then asked the Supreme Court to remove Van Dyck, based in part of disparaging comments the judge made about Wohlgemuth and/or his actions in the case in his orders.

The Tulsa World promptly reported the order, which was posted by the Rogers County District Court Clerk Friday morning, but as of noon the Claremore Daily Progress website did not mention it. That newspaper had promptly reported Singer’s motion to close records and the judge’s order granting it.

Category: News

Comments are closed.